David Horovitz ger Obama och riktlinjerna för ett avtal med Iran svidande kritik.
Varför är avtalet så fruktansvärt dåligt? Därför att det är det bästa avtal vi kunde få till stånd säger Obama.
But the deal is far worse than even our relentlessly lowered
expectations had given us reason to anticipate. The Arak heavy water
plant is not to be dismantled. Why not? Because this was the best deal
we could get. The Fordo enrichment facility, built secretly into a
mountain, is not to be shuttered. Why not? Because this was the best
deal we could get. Thousands of centrifuges are to be allowed to keep on
spinning. Thousands more will remain intact. For heaven’s sake, why?
Because this was the best deal we could get...
...Doubtless there is more of this travesty to
come. That’s what you get when you allow a brutal, murderous regime to
smell your hesitancy, your weakness, your neglect of your own and your
allies’ essential interests.
“This is our best bet by far to make sure Iran
doesn’t get a nuclear weapon,” Obama asserted to The New York
Times. Really, Mr. President? It doesn’t look like that from here. From
here, it looks like you could have done a whole lot better.
In fact, it looks like the very outcome you
promised you’d avoid: A deal that lifts the economic pressure on an evil
regime, and clears its route to the bomb. A bad deal. Far, far worse
than no deal at all.
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar